"4.) The code is right there, you are invited to improve the situation." Simple answer: I'm not a developer, I'm a user. A regular one.
Under less than 24 hours, after my post, the misc has received 2 or 3 brand new questions/posts regarding slow*. The problem is, well, obviously not me, personally. For the Dev Team (All of 'em. Volunteer, beer-teer, pay-teer ones): I regretfully think, the time of changing that filesystem older than my 2xgrandfather, has arrived. Ciao a tutti. infoomatic <[email protected]>, 7 Oca 2020 Sal, 18:31 tarihinde şunu yazdı: > 1.) OpenBSD never stated that ultimate performance is their goal, but > clean maintainable code is, and thus in case of a compromise the > developers will choose clean code over performance. > > 2.) to quote Breandan Gregg: "All benchmarks are wrong until proven > otherwise" > > 3.) It's 2020 and you quote a benchmark from 2018? > > 4.) The code is right there, you are invited to improve the situation. > > > Am 07.01.20 um 15:35 schrieb Hamd: > > > It's 2020 and it's -still- sad to see OpenBSD -still- has the > > lowest/poorest (general/overall) performance ever: > > https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=8-linux-bsd&num=1 > > > > My reference is not -only- that url, of course. My reference is my > OpenBSD, > > giving ~8 MB/s file transfer/network/disk speed. > > > > A Linux distro, on the same computer (dual boot), providing 89 MB/s > speed. > > > > (Longest) sad story of the year: When it comes to OpenBSD; security - > > great! Performance - horrible! I truly wish it was much better.. > > > > No, I'm not a fan of Calomel. >
