1.) OpenBSD never stated that ultimate performance is their goal, but clean maintainable code is, and thus in case of a compromise the developers will choose clean code over performance.
2.) to quote Breandan Gregg: "All benchmarks are wrong until proven otherwise" 3.) It's 2020 and you quote a benchmark from 2018? 4.) The code is right there, you are invited to improve the situation. Am 07.01.20 um 15:35 schrieb Hamd:
It's 2020 and it's -still- sad to see OpenBSD -still- has the lowest/poorest (general/overall) performance ever: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=8-linux-bsd&num=1 My reference is not -only- that url, of course. My reference is my OpenBSD, giving ~8 MB/s file transfer/network/disk speed. A Linux distro, on the same computer (dual boot), providing 89 MB/s speed. (Longest) sad story of the year: When it comes to OpenBSD; security - great! Performance - horrible! I truly wish it was much better.. No, I'm not a fan of Calomel.
