[not subscribed, please Cc, thanks.]
theo wrote:
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> [not subscribed, please Cc, thanks.]
>>
>> theo wrote:
>> ><[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> [not subscribed, please Cc, thanks.]
>> >>
>> >> theo wrote:
>> >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> [not subscribed, please Cc, thanks.]
>> >> >>
>> >> >> "Jason McIntyre" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > hi. the "asix chipset" bit seems unneccessary, since the driver is
>> >> >> > only
>> >> >> > for asix chips (as far as i can tell) and quickly skimming online
>> >> >> > fails
>> >> >> > to turn up such a model with a different chipset.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Dunno, there might well be a "plain" version with another (unspecified)
>> >> >> chipset, in which case we'd be confusing people...
>> >> >
>> >> > How true. Except there might also be two completely difference ones
>> >> > which look identical in the box. And your description might not
>> >> > differentiate
>> >> > between them!
>> >>
>> >> It does, however, constitute a hint that all might not be what it seems.
>> >
>> > No, because you've been too precis and claim others don't exist.
>>
>> Menever made that claim. Indeed, meput the double qotes there to signify
>> a *lack* of precision (thought merealizes not everyone might understand
>> that meaning).
>
> i'm out of arguments so i think i'll stamp on the floor
FTFY.
--zeur.
--
Friggin' Machines!
