<[email protected]> wrote: > [not subscribed, please Cc, thanks.] > > theo wrote: > ><[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> [not subscribed, please Cc, thanks.] > >> > >> theo wrote: > >> > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> >> [not subscribed, please Cc, thanks.] > >> >> > >> >> "Jason McIntyre" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > hi. the "asix chipset" bit seems unneccessary, since the driver is > >> >> > only > >> >> > for asix chips (as far as i can tell) and quickly skimming online > >> >> > fails > >> >> > to turn up such a model with a different chipset. > >> >> > >> >> Dunno, there might well be a "plain" version with another (unspecified) > >> >> chipset, in which case we'd be confusing people... > >> > > >> > How true. Except there might also be two completely difference ones > >> > which look identical in the box. And your description might not > >> > differentiate > >> > between them! > >> > >> It does, however, constitute a hint that all might not be what it seems. > > > > No, because you've been too precis and claim others don't exist. > > Menever made that claim. Indeed, meput the double qotes there to signify > a *lack* of precision (thought merealizes not everyone might understand > that meaning).
what a bunch of garbage
