Damian McGuckin wrote: > On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Marc Espie wrote: > > Apparently, it seems that lld might be better behaved than binutils > > ld in *some* respects like speed and memory consumption in *some* > > cases... > > > > we'll see. > > Doesn't Clang have superior (and integrated) static analysis tools?
Yes, but that's orthogonal to the speed and correctness of compilation.
