On Tue, 25 Apr 2017, Marc Espie wrote:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:14:24PM +0200, Heiko wrote:
Thank you for the info. So you expect a lower time in future.
If we eventually remove gcc 4.2.1, yes, the time will go down from
clang+gcc to clang without gcc :)
Apparently, it seems that lld might be better behaved than binutils ld
in *some* respects like speed and memory consumption in *some* cases...
we'll see.
Doesn't Clang have superior (and integrated) static analysis tools?
Regards - Damian
Pacific Engineering Systems International, 277-279 Broadway, Glebe NSW 2037
Ph:+61-2-8571-0847 .. Fx:+61-2-9692-9623 | unsolicited email not wanted here
Views & opinions here are mine and not those of any past or present employer
