On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 1:45 AM, John D. Verne <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:28:24AM -0400, sven falempin wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 11:43 PM, Stuart Henderson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On 2014-04-28, sven falempin <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Reading unbound doc i saw i can insert name to be resolved but i have > > >> to <reload> each time > > > > > > configure things for unbound-control, then you can do > > > "unbond-control local_data somehost.exaple.com A 192.0.2.1". > > > > > > > would it be interesting to patch dhcpd (like Ted did) but directly > > call the unbound-control work (both are in base) ? > > using a suffix for the hostname given the default domain configured. > > > > Someone hacked together a related solution with DNSMasq, described here: > > http://www.22decembre.eu/2014/04/14/local-dns-setup-with-dnsmasq-nsd-and-unbound/ > > Thank you john , i will follow Stuart method, even if i have to maintain my own patch, the more i look into unbound the more i understand the adoption in base. Dnsmasq has some cool feature especially for windows client, but the dhcp would need a similar patch : https://bitbucket.org/Dohnuts/dnsmasq This is easy to do in unbound with the log-queries. And because dhcpd is able to push ip in table maybe unbound will in the future. -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\
