Dear misc readers, Currently i am using dnsmasq because it inserts in the dns cache the hostname sended to the dhcp server it provides.
It's neat, and well done by dnsmasq. But it is not in base, moreover DNSSEC support is relying on some new crypto lib, and some features ( static route did creates some problems in the past. ) Reading unbound doc i saw i can insert name to be resolved but i have to <reload> each time, so to resolve the LAN clients hostnames i would need to - trigger a script when a lease is given (mostly depends the backend of the dhcp server) - write a script that tranalates the leases into a host/ip list for unbound - reload unbound conf IMHO: EWW Any opinion on doing this properly <in-base> ? - Priority to using in base openBSD software is my choice, because i rely on the openBSD community to outsmart my choices ! - Best regards, -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\
