On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 03:00:38PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Otto Moerbeek <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes, that's the wording used for rm(1). And -i should have a similar line. > > > > I checked net and free, they implement -i and -f as we do. > > Bizarrely, I read mv where you typed rm and used that. Now I notice > you said rm. All three should probably be consistent. Do we want the > notice posted after each option or after all the options, or both? >
after all the options works well for mv, where there's only two options. but less well for cp and rm, i'd say. also there are no other option combinations to discuss, like for ls, so i'd say after each option. however it will just be a matter of taste, so just pick your preference and make sure it's all consistent. jmc
