On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 03:00:38PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Otto Moerbeek <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Yes, that's the wording used for rm(1). And -i should have a similar line.
> >
> > I checked net and free, they implement -i and -f as we do.
>
> Bizarrely, I read mv where you typed rm and used that. Now I notice
> you said rm. All three should probably be consistent. Do we want the
> notice posted after each option or after all the options, or both?
Not all commands have -f an -i next to each other. I'd say if they are
separate, it should be mentioned with both options.
-Otto
