On Mon, 29 Jan 2024, Antonin Décimo wrote:
Signed-off-by: Antonin Décimo <anto...@tarides.com> --- .../winpthreads/tests/t_clock_gettime.c | 2 +- .../winpthreads/tests/t_clock_nanosleep.c | 2 +- .../winpthreads/tests/t_clock_settime.c | 2 +- .../winpthreads/tests/t_nanosleep.c | 2 +- mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/tests/test.c | 16 ++++++++-------- 5 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)diff --git a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/tests/t_clock_gettime.c b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/tests/t_clock_gettime.c index 45efc0ffe..a14899437 100644 --- a/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/tests/t_clock_gettime.c +++ b/mingw-w64-libraries/winpthreads/tests/t_clock_gettime.c @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ #include <assert.h> #include <pthread.h> -static void test_clock_gettime() +static void test_clock_gettime(void) { int rc; struct timespec tp, request = { 1, 0 }, remain;
This bit looks good - I guess that at least Clang warns about this? Can you add a data point in the commit message about where the issue was observed, that this patch fixes?
// Martin _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
