Le 27/06/2013 18:33, Kai Tietz a écrit :
> 2013/6/27 Jacek Caban <ja...@codeweavers.com>:
>> On 06/27/13 18:11, Rafaël Carré wrote:
>>> Le 27/06/2013 17:17, Earnie Boyd a écrit :
>>>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Rafaël Carré wrote:
>>>>> However ___lc_codepage_func seems to be also present in msvcrt.dll so
>>>>> why do we need emul?
>>>> That depends on the version of MSVCRT.DLL on the users system.  It is
>>>> emulated to avoid conflicts at runtime.
>>> That's what I am saying: it is always present.
>>
>> It seems like it was introduced for win2k:
>> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=AANLkTin3%3DFSgfsahb5vd78gM_y47KEtijfSBdCeDWBB7%40mail.gmail.com&forum_name=mingw-w64-public
>>
>>  Time to drop its support?
>>
>> Jacek
> 
> Hmm, well, I know we still have some people at least expecting support
> for "special craftet" applications.  Does this emulation-code really
> causes any major penalities for us?
> My 5 cents would go for keeping support here for w2k, so that at least
> startup (and some internal code) works still without issues for it.
> We should add a comment to it, which explict states that this code is
> w2k only, and therefore might get deprecated in future.
> 
> Kai

Here is a crashing sample with x64 target:

int main(void)
{
    unsigned int __cdecl ___lc_codepage_func();
    return ___lc_codepage_func();
}


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to