Ruben - Thanks.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Ruben Van Boxem <[email protected]> wrote: > Op 23 mrt. 2013 23:30 schreef "K. Frank" <[email protected]> het > volgende: >> >> Hi Ruben! >> ... >> > No sorry. I'll build an alternate toolchain this week. >> >> Okay, thanks. I'll keep my eyes open for it. >> >> A quick question: Just out of curiosity, what would be the benefit of >> a build that doesn't have std::thread? Is there some overhead, or is >> the build significantly bulkier? > > It makes even C programs depend on the winpthreads library. Although I see > nothing wrong with a single vs two DLLs you'd need to ship, some people have > expressed concerns. If you don't need c++11 concurrency, I'd recommend not > using a posix threading build. But that's just me :-) Oh, yes. I remember now seeing that discussion on this list. Makes sense. > Ruben Best. K. Frank ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
