Op 23 mrt. 2013 23:30 schreef "K. Frank" <[email protected]> het
volgende:
>
> Hi Ruben!
>
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 2013/3/23 K. Frank <[email protected]>
> >
> >> Hi Ruben!
> >> Yay! Go Ruben!
> >>
> >> On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
> >> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > Hi everyone,
> >> >
> >> > I am glad to announce my GCC 4.8.0 build. The 64-bit version uses the
> >> > ...
> >> Would I be correct in assuming that your build supports std::thread,
> >
> > No sorry. I'll build an alternate toolchain this week.
>
> Okay, thanks. I'll keep my eyes open for it.
>
> A quick question: Just out of curiosity, what would be the benefit of
> a build that doesn't have std::thread? Is there some overhead, or is
> the build significantly bulkier?
It makes even C programs depend on the winpthreads library. Although I see
nothing wrong with a single vs two DLLs you'd need to ship, some people
have expressed concerns. If you don't need c++11 concurrency, I'd recommend
not using a posix threading build. But that's just me :-)
Ruben
>
> > ...
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Ruben
>
> Cheerio!
>
>
> K. Frank
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
> _______________________________________________
> Mingw-w64-public mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
