On 9/20/2010 21:36, Earnie wrote: > Forgot to include the list. > > -------- Original Message -------- > Message-ID:<4c976081.6090...@users.sourceforge.net> > Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:24:17 -0400 > From: Earnie<ear...@users.sourceforge.net> > User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; > rv:1.9.1.13) Gecko/20100914 SeaMonkey/2.0.8 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > To: Kai Tietz<ktiet...@googlemail.com> > Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] libusb-win32 usb.h and MinGW-w64 > usb.h conflict > In-Reply-To: > <aanlktin0lc8fvjywv9pn_-kvaa8sqa+hepdsctxsv...@mail.gmail.com> > X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > Kai Tietz wrote: >> PS: I came to this by reading recent posts by Tor on mingw-users, >> where pointed out quite clear that mingw-w64 issues are a >> "non-subject" on mingw.org's ML. >> > > I hope that we can work together, I will speak up in favor of discussoin > of mingw-64 on the mingw.org's ML when I see this. I don't always join > in a conversation though due to lack of time/interest in the subject. > We also promote mingw-64 as the place for 64 bit binaries, but I > understand where you are coming from. Still, I would like to work with > you and not against you. > > Earnie >
Good, the flames were getting a bit old. Ozkan, can you explain your recent change with winusb.h? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
