Forgot to include the list. -------- Original Message -------- Message-ID: <4c976081.6090...@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:24:17 -0400 From: Earnie <ear...@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.13) Gecko/20100914 SeaMonkey/2.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kai Tietz <ktiet...@googlemail.com> Subject: Re: [Mingw-w64-public] libusb-win32 usb.h and MinGW-w64 usb.h conflict In-Reply-To: <aanlktin0lc8fvjywv9pn_-kvaa8sqa+hepdsctxsv...@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Kai Tietz wrote: > PS: I came to this by reading recent posts by Tor on mingw-users, > where pointed out quite clear that mingw-w64 issues are a > "non-subject" on mingw.org's ML. > I hope that we can work together, I will speak up in favor of discussoin of mingw-64 on the mingw.org's ML when I see this. I don't always join in a conversation though due to lack of time/interest in the subject. We also promote mingw-64 as the place for 64 bit binaries, but I understand where you are coming from. Still, I would like to work with you and not against you. Earnie ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public