Forgot to include the list.

-------- Original Message --------
Message-ID:     <4c976081.6090...@users.sourceforge.net>
Date:     Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:24:17 -0400
From:     Earnie <ear...@users.sourceforge.net>
User-Agent:     Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
rv:1.9.1.13) Gecko/20100914 SeaMonkey/2.0.8
MIME-Version:     1.0
To:     Kai Tietz <ktiet...@googlemail.com>
Subject:     Re: [Mingw-w64-public] libusb-win32 usb.h and MinGW-w64
usb.h conflict
In-Reply-To:   
 <aanlktin0lc8fvjywv9pn_-kvaa8sqa+hepdsctxsv...@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version:     1.0.1
Content-Type:     text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding:     7bit



Kai Tietz wrote:
> PS: I came to this by reading recent posts by Tor on mingw-users,
> where pointed out quite clear that mingw-w64 issues are a
> "non-subject" on mingw.org's ML.
>

I hope that we can work together, I will speak up in favor of discussoin
of mingw-64 on the mingw.org's ML when I see this.  I don't always join
in a conversation though due to lack of time/interest in the subject.
We also promote mingw-64 as the place for 64 bit binaries, but I
understand where you are coming from.  Still, I would like to work with
you and not against you.

Earnie



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to