David Reveman wrote:
On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 14:46 +0200, Hanno Böck wrote:
Hi,
A long while back, davidr posted a patch called r200-copy-pixels-1.patch
together with the first big xgl update telling that this would be required
for performant operation of xgl.
This patch still applies to current mesa cvs. I wanted to ask if
a) it still makes sense to apply this patch?
b) if yes, this shouldn't be applied to upstream Mesa?
Patch is here:
http://svn.hboeck.de/xgl-overlay/media-libs/mesa/files/r200-copy-pixels-1.patch
Patch doesn't make sense anymore. Xgl now uses GLX_MESA_copy_sub_buffer
instead. Fast copy pixel performance is still useful but that patch is
no good.
Do you mean "the patch is no good for Xgl"? Or, "the patch is defective"?
If it's not defective, I'll check it in.
-Brian
-------------------------------------------------------
All the advantages of Linux Managed Hosting--Without the Cost and Risk!
Fully trained technicians. The highest number of Red Hat certifications in
the hosting industry. Fanatical Support. Click to learn more
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid7521&bid$8729&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Mesa3d-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mesa3d-dev
