Hi Ian, On 15 April 2015 at 19:36, Ian Romanick <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Ian Romanick <[email protected]> > > In response to another patch, Emil asked for some clarification how this > stuff works. Rather than just reply to the e-mail, I decided to update > the exlanation in the code. > Upon a closer look "supported" seems to has a meaning that is closer to "capable". Presently as we go through the lists in __glXCalculateUsableExtensions, we construct a list of usable/effective extensions out of the supported ones which can be a bit confusing.
All of the above seems to be only when indirect rendering is involved. Huge thanks for the comment, it does help out a fair bit. -Emil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
