On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:42:42AM -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote: > On 07/10/2013 04:38 PM, Ian Romanick wrote: > [snip] > >Could we just change our "Mark the patch with 'NOTE: ...'" policy with > >"To have the patch automatically included in the stable tree, add the tag > > Cc: [email protected] > > > >in the sign-off area..." ? > > This loses a bit of information, sadly. > > These two are interchangeable: > NOTE: This is a candidate for the stable branches. > Cc: [email protected] > > But what about: > NOTE: This is a candidate for the 9.2 branch. > (but not the 9.1 branch, or 9.0 branch...) > > What then?
Is there any reason why CC: [email protected] is preferable over the old NOTE: This is a candidate ... annotation? -Tom _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
