I'm fine with this. Personally, I'd say let marketing sort out their mess.
Patches 5-6:
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]>
On 01.08.2017 00:43, Marek Olšák wrote:
From: Marek Olšák <[email protected]>
---
src/gallium/drivers/radeon/r600_pipe_common.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/radeon/r600_pipe_common.c
b/src/gallium/drivers/radeon/r600_pipe_common.c
index c58048f..e9402f8 100644
--- a/src/gallium/drivers/radeon/r600_pipe_common.c
+++ b/src/gallium/drivers/radeon/r600_pipe_common.c
@@ -1338,21 +1338,22 @@ bool r600_common_screen_init(struct r600_common_screen
*rscreen,
struct radeon_winsys *ws, unsigned flags)
{
char family_name[32] = {}, llvm_string[32] = {}, kernel_version[128] =
{};
struct utsname uname_data;
const char *chip_name;
ws->query_info(ws, &rscreen->info);
rscreen->ws = ws;
if ((chip_name = r600_get_marketing_name(ws)))
- snprintf(family_name, sizeof(family_name), "%s / ",
r600_get_family_name(rscreen));
+ snprintf(family_name, sizeof(family_name), "%s / ",
+ r600_get_family_name(rscreen) + 4);
else
chip_name = r600_get_family_name(rscreen);
if (uname(&uname_data) == 0)
snprintf(kernel_version, sizeof(kernel_version),
" / %s", uname_data.release);
if (HAVE_LLVM > 0) {
snprintf(llvm_string, sizeof(llvm_string),
", LLVM %i.%i.%i", (HAVE_LLVM >> 8) & 0xff,
--
Lerne, wie die Welt wirklich ist,
Aber vergiss niemals, wie sie sein sollte.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
