On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 12:39 +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 10.03.2011, 12:02 +0100 schrieb Philip Van Hoof: > > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 23:24 +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote: > > > PS: To get some more numbers I ran few quick searches on bugs.gnome.org: > > > > > > ":evolution-data-server :contacts" finds 70 bugs > > > ":evolution-data-server" even finds 354 bugs > > > > Nod. And it's not that several years ago at Nokia, during Fremantle, > > people where 'satisfied' with EDS. I haven't seen huge improvements > > happening to EDS since that period. > > Fremantle's EDS version differs greatly from GNOME EDS. To get a > realistic idea of the effort needed for turning libebook into something > that's somewhat production ready, take a look at at the long commit > history of Fremantle EDS: http://maemo.gitorious.org/eds-fremantle/
And still the teams using it were not satisfied in the end :) At least that's what I remember. I also wonder what version of EDS is being proposed for MeeGo. The eds-fremantle or GNOME's EDS. And how much of the changes in for the Fremantle version are now in GNOME's upstream EDS? > Yes, we should have tried harder to get into upstream EDS development. > First our version of libebook-dbus was in horrible. Later the delta > became too large to handle. Too little time. Too many secrets around the > N900. Naive planing. :-/ Ah, yes. Good old times Mathias. Good old times. We'll recover from that when we're old. At some conference while complaining about those young guys, with a good beer. You know. :-) Cheers, Philip -- Philip Van Hoof freelance software developer Codeminded BVBA - http://codeminded.be _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
