On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > given the events of the last few weeks, the MeeGo architects have, and still > are, revisiting various parts of the MeeGo architecture.
Aside from this thread, where does this discussion happen? How do others engage? > Having said that, three items are currently clear enough to make a final > decision on: > > 1) MSSF / MeeGo security framework > 2) Buteo Sync > 3) PIM storage (currently stored in the tracker database) Reading between the lines, it appears that the MeeGo architects are re-evaluating Nokia contributions. This is well and good, but the question that you do not address Arjan is who is going to be responsible for assuring that this re-evaluation is done with careful consideration of both MeeGo's stated target architectures? If you rip out libraries and software that is optimized or designed for the ARM platform for example that may lead to the perception that MeeGo is sliding back in Moblin. Careful assessment of the current architecture requirements needs to be done from a cross-platform perspective and done in the open. It would be good if MeeGo had more ARM experts at the architects level to ensure parity in at least discourse on design. Right now it is in danger of sinking into a back room monolog. Regards, Jeremiah _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev http://wiki.meego.com/Mailing_list_guidelines
