>________________________________________ >From: Andrew Flegg [[email protected]] on behalf of ext Andrew Flegg >[[email protected]] >Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 4:20 PM >To: Alhola Kate (Nokia-FNDC/Helsinki); [email protected]; >[email protected] >Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps > without libmeegotouch over MTF >enabled application? > >On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, 13:50:35 GMT, [email protected] wrote: >> >> With Qt Quick you have all enablers for full MeeGo UX and in Qt Quick >> Components you have all UX components ready made. > >Well, not yet. And it's not yet clear what that means in terms of good >cross-platform support (e.g. Symbian, Maemo or >MeeGo).
Components is still pre-alpha but it should be clear that is provides best mobile cross platform solution. QWidgets provide good cross platform solution in desktop but it does not fit in mobile UX paradigm. >What *is* the timescale and roadmap for Qt Quick Components? Thiago or Henrik Harz can comment this issue ? Kate _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
