________________________________
>From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of 
>ext Ville M. Vainio [[email protected]]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 3:23 PM
>To: Rohit Baravkar; meego-dev
>Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without 
>libmeegotouch over MTF enabled application?
>

>Disadvantage with both QWidgets (which is what I assume you mean by Qt w/o 
>meegotouch) and mtf is that neither is an officially supported solution, i.e. 
>you are on your own if you use them. If something >works today (e.g. 
>gestures), somebody may decide to break it tomorrow without prior warning.
>
>Go for Qt Quick if you've got a choice.


Very big disadvantage to do QWidget application is that you can't get full 
MeeGo handset user experience, you don't have

sliding stacked windows, portrait orientation / orientation switching support, 
animations etc and you can't do them at

all with QWidgets ( without doing everything with proxywidget ).


With Qt Quick you have all enablers for full MeeGo UX and in Qt Quick 
Components you have all UX components ready made.


Kate

--
Sent from my Nokia N900

----- Original message -----
> What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over
> MTF (Meego touch framework) enabled application.?
>
> If we need to implement gestures for any given use case, will a
> application based on libmeegotouch be more smoother than QT app without
> libmeegotouch?
>
> Any touch testing results benchmark done on Meego?
>
>
> -Rohit

_______________________________________________
MeeGo-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev

Reply via email to