On Saturday 18 September 2010 19:05:52 you wrote: > >> Instead, why not leave "MeeGo Compliant Apps" alone and carve room in > >> the spec for "MeeGo Extras." Either allow only one "Extras" repos. Or > >> PREFIX > > > > Saying 'oh, not being compliant is not a big deal, look, we have > > thousands of non-compliant apps that are safe and run just fine !' > > sounds really bad from the aspect of the future value of term MeeGo > > Compliant for *users and developers*. > > Except that's *not* what I said.
Maybe it's just me. but that is how it sounds, if those apps in Extras *are* hosted and/or encouraged by meego.com, but *not* part of the MeeGo Compliance program. Best regards, Attila Csipa _______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
