On 22 July 2010 08:26, John Carmark <[email protected]> wrote: > I think one problem is, can MeeGo be optimized to fit the mobile > phones that doesn't have powerful CPUs? Such as Nokia 5230. If Meego > can run perfectly in most of the Symbian S60 phones, it'll be popular > soon. >
I think Nokia had already hinted saying that MeeGo would be for their high-end devices only and Symbian for the rest which I think is the right way. If the hardware is not capable, why spend time/money/energy on it porting to a low powered device then? Doing that, you will too much complicate the process and finally yourself. Look what Microsoft, Google and virtually every one else are doing now. They all are going the same route. The route of dictating the minimum hardware specs required to run their respective OS's. On a side note: The list of companies that have pledged support for MeeGo so far is here. Please note that this list is not the absolute latest. http://forum.meego.com/showthread.php?t=46 http://linux-foundation.org/weblogs/press/2010/04/12/meego-developer-community-grows-as-software-ecosystem-support-broadens/ http://linux-foundation.org/weblogs/press/2010/04/12/public-support-for-the-meego-project/ Thanks, @vkvraju > 2010/7/22 Hawk Wang <[email protected]>: > > The question is too big.... let's say in technology and business ways. > > > > From techonlogy viewpoint, I like meego is better than android. Even > there are so many android players, but linux has more. > > > > From business viewpoint, we need final product. Nokia seems the only one > vendor to provide meego mobile phone so far. > > > > Hawk > > > > > > > > > >> ----- 原始邮件 ----- > >> 发件人: "Felipe Contreras" <[email protected]> > >> 收件人: [email protected], [email protected] > >> 主题: Re: [MeeGo-dev] Difference between MeeGo and Android? > >> 日期: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 17:21:33 +0300 > >> > >> > >>[email protected] wrote: > >> > So far, what would you say are the main difference between MeeGo and > >> > Android? > >> > >> These are the ones I find important: > >> > >> Companies involved: > >> * Android: Intel, ARM, Marvell, Qualcomm, Nvidia, Texas Instruments, > >> Broadcom, NXP, PacketVideo, Google, HTC, LG, Motorola, Samsung, > >> Ericsson, Toshiba, Dell, Acer, Garmin (and more) > >> * MeeGo: Intel, Nokia > >> > >> Products released: > >> * Android: more than 200 > >> * MeeGo: 0 > >> > >> Technologies used: > >> * Android: mostly proprietary > >> * MeeGo: mostly shared with FOSS community > >> > >> Using Linux?: > >> * Android: kind of a fork > >> * MeeGo: yes, close to upstream > >> > >> > What does it do better? And what does it do worse? Benefits vs. > >> > shortcomings? > >> > >> Without seeing a few MeeGo devices, I'm not sure much can be said about > >> what MeeGo would do better. > >> > >> -- > >> Felipe Contreras > >> _______________________________________________ > >> MeeGo-dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev > >> > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > Ovi Mail: Making email access easy > > http://mail.ovi.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > MeeGo-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > MeeGo-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev > -- http://www.vkvraju.com http://vkvraju.blogspot.com http://vkvraju.wordpress.com
_______________________________________________ MeeGo-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.meego.com/listinfo/meego-dev
