+ 1 (non-binding)

-> verified all checksums
-> build from source on JDK 17
-> ran hadoop-azure (ABFS) integration tests. All passing.
-> verified release notes for major abfs and wasb changes.

Thanks a lot for driving this release. All the best

Anuj Modi

On Mon, Mar 30, 2026 at 2:32 AM Chris Nauroth <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> * Verified all checksums.
> * Verified all signatures.
> * Built from source, including native code on Linux.
>     * mvn clean package -Pnative -Psrc -Drequire.openssl -Drequire.snappy
> -Drequire.zstd -DskipTests
> * Tests passed.
>     * mvn --fail-never clean test -Pnative -Dparallel-tests
> -Drequire.snappy -Drequire.zstd -Drequire.openssl
> -Dsurefire.rerunFailingTestsCount=3 -DtestsThreadCount=8
> * ARM distro does contain ARM-compatible binaries, and hadoop checknative
> -a is successful.
> * All hadoop-gcp integration tests pass.
> * Successfully built a full distro from source with all
> hadoop-cloud-storage providers and their bundled dependencies.
> * Manually tested several hadoop fs commands against a GCS bucket.
> * Verified inclusion of latest lz4-java 1.10.4 upgrade in both x86 and ARM
> binaries.
> * Apache Pulsar pre-submits related to Hadoop integration are successful
> with the new RC.
>     * https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/25402
>
> I filed the following bugs for follow-up targeted to 3.5.1. I don't
> consider any of these to be blockers for 3.5.0.
>
> HADOOP-19851: Update S3A GCS compatibility docs to point to hadoop-gcs
> HADOOP-19852: hadoop-tos test failures due to reflection failure
> HADOOP-19853: S3A integration test failures against GCS bucket
>
> Chris Nauroth
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 2:08 PM Aaron Fabbri <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> > I downloaded the release, verified the checksum, and installed on three
> > containers.
> > Ran some mapreduce examples which succeeded.
> >
> > Only did a quick sanity-check this time: I'm still getting back up to
> speed
> > on tools for more thorough testing.
> >
> > Thanks for all the hard work Chris!
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 2:02 PM Mukund Madhav Thakur <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Used hadoop-release-support to download and validate the checksums and
> > gpg
> > > keys.- All good.
> > > Untar the source and maven build - all good.
> > > Untar the binary and then added the aws bundle jar and run hadoop fs
> > > command to access S3 buckets - All good.
> > > git checkout the tag release and build and run s3a connector
> integration
> > > tests - Mostly good other than this new tests
> > > ITestS3AFileSystemIsolatedClassloader failures mentioned below.
> > >
> > > Thanks Chris for working on the release.
> > >
> > > [*ERROR*] *Errors: *
> > >
> > > [*ERROR*] *
> > >
> > >
> >
> ITestS3AFileSystemIsolatedClassloader.defaultIsolatedClassloader:130->assertInNewFilesystem:103->createNewTestFs:78
> > > » LogConfiguration java.lang.IllegalStateException: Could not invoke
> > public
> > > final java.lang.ClassLoader java.lang.ClassLoader.getParent() on
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.ITestS3AFileSystemIsolatedClassloader$CustomClassLoader@3e5ebdfe
> > > with arguments [] (Caused by java.lang.IllegalStateException: Could not
> > > invoke public final java.lang.ClassLoader
> > java.lang.ClassLoader.getParent()
> > > on
> > >
> > >
> >
> org.apache.hadoop.fs.s3a.ITestS3AFileSystemIsolatedClassloader$CustomClassLoader@3e5ebdfe
> > > with arguments [])*
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 12:03 PM Chris Nauroth <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Are we sure about Java 21 client-side? This isn't something I've been
> > > > specifically testing myself, and I don't think we have a CI run
> > > configured
> > > > with Java 21.
> > > >
> > > > I'm ~80% done with my test plan and expect to cast my vote soon. I've
> > > found
> > > > a few minor bugs to target for 3.5.1, but no blockers so far.
> > > >
> > > > Chris Nauroth
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 4:34 AM Steve Loughran <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 binding
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >    1. downloaded and validated binary tars using
> > hadoop-release-support
> > > > >    (updated 3.5.0 properties with rc and staging info from the
> email)
> > > > >    2. maven build to validate dependencies
> > > > >    3. local source build
> > > > >    4. on arm64 linux box,  download and validate native aarch64
> > > > artifacts,
> > > > >    including -native
> > > > >    5. compared maven artifacts with those of x86 tar: they match
> > > > >    6. added aws bundle.jar to binary release and attempted various
> > > > >    commands: all good
> > > > >
> > > > > No doubt there'll be surprises which need a followup, but we should
> > > ship
> > > > > this for java21 client support as well as java17 server. Then we
> can
> > > > handle
> > > > > issues which are reported.  Getting it out will mean that everyone
> > who
> > > > > wants a release with an updated jackson and other things has an
> > > > actionable
> > > > > answer "upgrade" rather than "wait". We get those emails on the
> > > security
> > > > > list.
> > > > >
> > > > > -steve
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2026 at 13:02, Cheng Pan <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. Passed Apache Spark integration tests[1]
> > > > > > 2. Checked aarch64 binary tarball, content looks good, especially
> > > > > > expected lz4-java 1.10.4 exists.
> > > > > > 3. Deployed HDFS, YARN (with Spark External Shuffle Service Aux
> > > > > > service) into a small cluster:
> > > > > >   i) 1 master, 3 workers, Ubuntu 24.04 arm64, OpenJDK 25,
> Kerberos
> > > > > > enabled, jsvc 1.5.1
> > > > > >   ii) run some basic Spark jobs, randomly click YARN UI,
> everything
> > > > looks
> > > > > > fine.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/54448
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Cheng Pan
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 1:03 PM Chris Nauroth <
> [email protected]
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If you would like to use hadoop-release-support for
> verification,
> > > > > please
> > > > > > > sync to the latest commit:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/hadoop-release-support/commit/27780bb09af7d9e85d5d7d94690b7ab369ee2cf3
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Chris Nauroth
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 9:12 PM Chris Nauroth <
> > [email protected]
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I have put together a release candidate (RC2) for Hadoop
> 3.5.0.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > This is a new minor version focused on JDK 17 compatibility,
> > new
> > > > > cloud
> > > > > > > > storage integrations, dependency upgrades, security patches,
> > and
> > > > new
> > > > > > > > features.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Change log
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hadoop/hadoop-3.5.0-RC2/CHANGELOG.md
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Release notes
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hadoop/hadoop-3.5.0-RC2/RELEASENOTES.md
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The RC is available at:
> > > > > > > >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/hadoop/hadoop-3.5.0-RC2/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The git tag is release-3.5.0-RC2, commit
> > > > > > > > dbcc7cd797100e6b32cd84f85b53a5193a5f9af0.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The maven artifacts are staged at
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1470
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You can find my public key at:
> > > > > > > >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/hadoop/common/KEYS
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please try the RC and vote. This vote is intended to run for
> 5
> > > > days.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Chris Nauroth
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to