Dňa 23. júna 2025 15:56:53 UTC používateľ Michael Peddemors via mailop <[email protected]> napísal: >If the Message-ID is missing, Microsoft is doing the right thing adding it, >that takes precedence over breaking the DKIM signature..
While you are right, that Message-ID is required header, but adding missing headers is task for MSA, not for MTA, which is forbiden to modify message, especially in DKIM era... >I guess this is a good way to let you know that you should be including that >header ;) No, it is far from good way. Good way would be to reject message with "Message-ID required" (or so) reason... regards -- Slavko https://www.slavino.sk/ _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list [email protected] https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
