On Monday 02 November 2009 21:52:48 Jeremiah Foster wrote: > On Nov 2, 2009, at 10:27, Ed Bartosh wrote: > > 2009/11/2 Jeremiah Foster <[email protected]>: > >> On Nov 1, 2009, at 18:05, Ed Bartosh wrote: > >>> Idea of having separate queue for Extras updates sounds more > >>> promising > >>> to me. Developers might become confused with all this set of > >>> repositories, queues and processes, but the idea is good. I support > >>> this. > > > > What about this? Can we have separate queue for updates? Any other > > ideas? > > Can you explain how this might work and it's advantages? I am not > against it aside from the fact that I think another repo is confusing. > Is the proposal to create a repo called extras-updates which would > hold only updates to software that has already existed in the repos? I > don't see how that is different from just updating the existing > package with new software. If you want to pull in different version > numbers than what exists why would you need a separate repo?
Sorry, like Jeremiah I am now a bit confused. Can you, Ed, please summarise what this proposal is? You mention separate queue but which queue are you referring to? Does the suggestion involve additional repositories? And/or does it involve differnet rules for which repositories will be in scope during a build? Or what. Sorry if everyone else understands this but I don't. > I think this is adding complexity - and we are in danger of having too > much complexity already. Definitely a point worth bearing in mind! Graham _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
