On 1/27/18, Charles Steinkuehler <[email protected]> wrote: > > Nuttx looks very interesting, thanks for the heads-up. > > As I said, I'm really glad to see some of the "maker" targeted code > moving away from running bare-metal. I don't think it makes any sense > to try and port the full CNC stack to Nuttx, but I could see a use for > the HAL layer. > > I doubt anyone here has an immediate interest in porting HAL to Nuttx, > but if you (or someone else) cares to try I can advise and answer > questions. I think the basic guts of HAL and RTAPI should port over > pretty easily since Nuttx is a posix OS, but it might be trickier with > some of the higher-level stuff (python bindings, haltalk messaging). >
I'm also busy with other projects, but I also can help people willing to do it. The HAL/RTAPI could be interesting to run on low cost board like the BluePill (stm32f103c8t6 minimum board). It has 128KB Flash and 20KB RAM and cost less than U$ 2.00. But it should be necessary to create some communication interface with the full CNC stack. BR, Alan -- website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: https://github.com/machinekit --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Machinekit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/machinekit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
