Hi Alan the link to that custom image file you will find in the first post in this thread. ( This is made from my own script files and not Roberts online generated).
On Nov 23, 2017 18:35, "Condit Alan" <[email protected]> wrote: > Michael, > > Is there an image for a uSD for the DE10 that will boot and run? I know > you were working on an image that would boot both the DE0 and the DE10. > > I have been away for awhile. I tried the 10/29/2017 http://deb. > machinekit.io/uploads/de0-nano/debian-9.2-console-armhf-2017-10-29 upload > but I couldn’t get it to boot the DE10. > > Alan > > On Oct 23, 2017, at 9:12 AM, Michael Brown <[email protected]> > wrote: > > As I did promise to return with my findings and report back when my > Cyclone V partial reconfiguration quest had meet an conclusion I am not > happy to verdict that is is true that it does work and that it is true that > it does also not work "out of the box". > > Until the license for incremental compilation and the pr core is open > licensed, I will stick to consensus on the web of not placing any guide > describing how to get it to work on Cyclone V with the linux dts overlay > method. > > I have instead chosen to share the steps needed in the shared folder > available and let those that are benevolently curious, investigative and > open minded for open source hardware, fetch/grab the shared file and go > look see what they would have to say if they deducted such easily fixable > creative omissions themself. > Leading to the "It dosn't work" statement above that fueled and kicked my > relentless truth based intuitive guidance system into me having to provide > verification of everything works if you know how to fix the omissions. > What remains is that: > Until such functionality is UNlicensed partial reconfiguration is > unavailable for open hardware or source development contributors. > > "It dosnt work" --> mythbusted :-) > > Now whats that about an open sourced hardware society as the next > evolutionary step ? > > On Sunday, 3 September 2017 06:27:26 UTC+2, Michael Brown wrote: >> >> Yes, I agree. >> >> On Sun, 3 Sep 2017 at 05.33, mugginsac <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Michael, >>> >>> It seemed to take forever to write, but eventually using dd the image >>> wrote to the uSD and it boots. >>> >>> I am in agreement with you that having the hdmi for local maintenance is >>> a good idea. I have never tried to run 3D graphics on one of these small >>> "card" computers. I think running linuxcnc or machinekit via ssh makes a >>> lot of sense. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Alan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > -- > website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: > https://github.com/machinekit > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the > Google Groups "Machinekit" group. > To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > topic/machinekit/BPRQpoyvFm8/unsubscribe. > To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to > [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/machinekit. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: https://github.com/machinekit --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Machinekit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/machinekit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
