On 24/02/19 7:18 AM, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Richard Hector! > >> Yep, sure. But LXD is currently the most common way to manage LXC, >> right? > > Right? Right?! Riiight???!!!!!! > > Sorry, but your insistence is not going to change the facts.
Steady on. I wasn't insisting on anything; I was checking my assumptions. Maybe my New Zealand English usage is more unusual than I thought. I guess you're saying my assumption was wrong. >> At least, when I ask LXC questions on here, people seem to be >> surprised that I'm not using LXD. > > I'm not using LXD. It's just not suitable for my use cases. Ok. I'm not either, but that's more because it's not in Debian, and I like to stick with packaged solutions where I can. I haven't even tried it yet. >> So with LXD transitioning to snap in Ubuntu, is it expected that LXD >> will only be used for snap packages? > >> And if I want to continue using LXC without snap, I won't get the >> advantages of managing it with LXD? > > I'd like to know the answer as well. Right. We can both wait and see if someone else answers :-) Richard _______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
