Greetings, Richard Hector! > Yep, sure. But LXD is currently the most common way to manage LXC, > right?
Right? Right?! Riiight???!!!!!! Sorry, but your insistence is not going to change the facts. > At least, when I ask LXC questions on here, people seem to be > surprised that I'm not using LXD. I'm not using LXD. It's just not suitable for my use cases. > So with LXD transitioning to snap in Ubuntu, is it expected that LXD > will only be used for snap packages? > And if I want to continue using LXC without snap, I won't get the > advantages of managing it with LXD? I'd like to know the answer as well. Snaps may be useful for distributors, but it's a maintenance headache for end users. Not to mention the growing disk space usage from snap packages. -- With best regards, Andrey Repin Saturday, February 23, 2019 21:16:07 Sorry for my terrible english... _______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
