On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Ron Kelley <[email protected]> wrote:
> Fajar, > > Just following up on this thread. Thanks for pointing out the redundant > NAT problem with ufw. I found another solution to prevent this issue when > restarting ufw (from here: https://gist.github.com/kimus/9315140 in the > comments section) > > Adding a “-F” statement before your first NAT rule flushes the NAT - > thereby preventing the redundant NAT entries. > That would certainly work, if ufw is the only one managing NAT rules. I forgot to mention that my ufw deployment was on the lxd host, where there were also NATs created by lxdbr0 in a custom chain. Using only "-F" in my case would mean lxdbr0 NAT is removed as well. -- Fajar
_______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
