after testing one of too many firewall solutions I went back to just running plain ubuntu and then put an iptables "frontend" on top of it. In my case I chose firehol, but there's a number of them and it's largely a matter of taste/how you work. It really depends what you care for, if you want an appliance kind of thing that won't work, as it doesn't come with batteries included, ie a gui, graphs etc, but if you want a clean working firehol without the hassle of managing rules yourself, then ubuntu + a fw manager will do wonders and actually keeps things simpler ime.
hope that helps, Spike On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 10:07 PM gunnar.wagner <[email protected]> wrote: > I know that's only touching your point slightly but (as far as I know) > pfSense requires 2 physical WAN ports in order to run. > > So I'd doubt is can be containerized to begin with > > > On 4/25/2017 12:10 AM, Ron Kelley wrote: > > Greetings all, > > I am looking for an easy-to-configure firewall tool that provides > NAT/Gateway/Firewall functions for other containers. I know I can use > iptables, etc, but I would like something more easily managed (web-based > tool?) like pfSense, IPFire, IPCop, etc. Unfortunately, many of the tools > are ISO based which require “real” VM instances. > > I can’t seem to find any turn-key LXD firewall images; maybe I am looking in > the wrong place? > > Any pointers? > > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > lxc-users mailing > [email protected]http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users > > > -- > Gunnar Wagner | Yongfeng Village Group 12 #5, Pujiang Town, Minhang > District, 201112 Shanghai, P.R. CHINA > mob +86.159.0094.1702 <+86%20159%200094%201702> | skype: professorgunrad > | wechat: 15900941702 > _______________________________________________ > lxc-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
_______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
