On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 13:45 +0300, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Simos Xenitellis! > > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:34 AM, gunnar.wagner > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > just saw it again .... > > > > > > 'lxc-[cmd]' (LXC Containers) vs > > > 'lxc [cmd]' (LXD Containers) > > > > > > it would be so much less confusing whether LXD would just > > > use 'lxd [cmd]' > > > instead of 'lxc [cmd]' syntax > > > > > > - Am I (being a total novice and all) alone with this thought? > > > - any benefit from the current 'lxc [cmd]' command syntax for > > > LXD > > > containers? > > > > > > just wondering. Maybe it's an age-old discussion here but as > > > someone diving > > > new into this ... it hits you right in the face > > > > > I think the issue here is this, is there any growing interest in > > LXC1 > > (those lxc-[cmd] commands)? > > LXD/LXC is more usable than legacy LXC (i.e. LXC1). > > LXC requires less infrastructure and easier to manage. > I prefer it over LXD for persistent deployments. > >
I agree, for now, with the lack of "easy to get" documentation. LXC is still very much alive. _______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
