Greetings, Simos Xenitellis! > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:34 AM, gunnar.wagner > <[email protected]> wrote: >> just saw it again .... >> >> 'lxc-[cmd]' (LXC Containers) vs >> 'lxc [cmd]' (LXD Containers) >> >> it would be so much less confusing whether LXD would just use 'lxd [cmd]' >> instead of 'lxc [cmd]' syntax >> >> - Am I (being a total novice and all) alone with this thought? >> - any benefit from the current 'lxc [cmd]' command syntax for LXD >> containers? >> >> just wondering. Maybe it's an age-old discussion here but as someone diving >> new into this ... it hits you right in the face >>
> I think the issue here is this, is there any growing interest in LXC1 > (those lxc-[cmd] commands)? > LXD/LXC is more usable than legacy LXC (i.e. LXC1). LXC requires less infrastructure and easier to manage. I prefer it over LXD for persistent deployments. -- With best regards, Andrey Repin Tuesday, April 18, 2017 13:44:27 Sorry for my terrible english... _______________________________________________ lxc-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
