In version 0.6.1 that I have, multiple outputs are not supported.
I think that the most reasonable way would be to allow users to use
Rakarrack as it is - and to load their presets into it.
Using one instance and routing all effects in-out will give us a incomplete
solution.
I think the power of Rakarrack lays in the fact that you have a chain of
pedals and they all work together for a certain effect.
As I wrote before: using a stack of processors never gave mu as good
effects as the Rakarrack "chain".
Users will see that this is a big one, and that overusing it may kill the
CPU, but multiple instances would be a great thing.
2014-01-27 Vesa <[email protected]>
> On 01/27/2014 01:21 PM, Tobiasz Karoń wrote:
> >
> >
> > It would be really cool to have Rakkarack applicable as an effect in
> > the mixer. However I have no idea how to do it. Plus running a few of
> > Rakarracks could be CPU-heavy.
> >
>
> Then it would probably need to be done in a way that the effect plugins
> in LMMS would just be interfaces to Rackarrack, and only one Rackarrack
> instance would be loaded, with all effect lines routed to it via
> different channels.
>
> I expect Rackarrack does support multiple input/output channels...?
>
--
Tobiasz *unfa*
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GIT/MU/P d->-- s+:-(--)> a? C++(+++)>$ ULC+(++)>$ !P? L+++>++++$ E? W++>$
!N-? !o--? K-? !w-- O? !M-- V? PS++ PE++ !Y+ !PGP+? !t(+) 5? !X !R+ tv
b+>+++ DI>+ D+ G e h-->- !r y--()
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.
Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
