ilovepi wrote:
> Somewhat off-topic for this PR, but why can't `REQUIRES: shell` force use of > shell even if internal shell is the default? Then we don't lose test coverage > and don't block this on migration of the long-tail of tests. Previously, we've discussed giving lit a hybrid mode that would allow you to run all the tests w/o `REQUIRES: shell` in the internal shell, but still allow it to run all the shell tests if the shell is available. That would allow us to burn down the `REQUIRES: shell` bits over time, and figure out what features we want the internal shell to support. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/157232 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
