================
@@ -1018,9 +1019,9 @@ namespace cwg62 { // cwg62: 2.9
struct A {
struct { int n; } b;
};
- template<typename T> struct X {};
- template<typename T> T get() { return get<T>(); }
- template<typename T> int take(T) { return 0; }
+ template<typename T> struct X {}; // cxx98-note 6{{template parameter is
declared here}}
----------------
mizvekov wrote:
> I'm not certain I understand the concern then. The request is to do something
> like:
> so either way it is actually checking the whole diagnostic sequence, just
> that with bookmarks it's easier to tell which warnings/errors generate what
> notes.
No it's not actually checking the sequence, because the notes can be attached
to random diagnostics which are not actually the preceding ones, and the tests
will still pass.
The diagnostic verifier does not currently check the order diagnostics appear
in, writing the test expectations like this only gives you the illusion that it
does :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126088
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
