================
@@ -1018,9 +1019,9 @@ namespace cwg62 { // cwg62: 2.9
struct A {
struct { int n; } b;
};
- template<typename T> struct X {};
- template<typename T> T get() { return get<T>(); }
- template<typename T> int take(T) { return 0; }
+ template<typename T> struct X {}; // cxx98-note 6{{template parameter is
declared here}}
----------------
mizvekov wrote:
Yeah, I was in a break at that time because I was moving to a different
country. I was quite surprised when I ran into it later.
There was no discussion about these points I raised on that PR, was there any
other discussions in other mediums, like Discourse?
I think the more important question is, do we need this amount of detail for
the diagnostic messages of DR tests specifically, what makes them more special
than the other tests in this case?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126088
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
