heiher wrote: > I'd still prefer not to backport this. We're changing many targets to use > softPromoteHalfType in LLVM 20 (hopefully all if someone gets around to > it...), with the ABI changes that implies. I don't think it makes sense to > backport this just for loongarch, and I also don't want to backport this for > all targets where this change is made (esp as the changes are trickling in > slowly over time).
I agree with you. It's reasonable. Thanks for your feedback. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109093 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
