heiher wrote: > @heiher this would still break the ABI right? so it would still create > problem for downstream users like rust? > > cc @nikic @arsenm @tgross35
After deciding that [FPU does not support fp16](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109368#issuecomment-2423879356), there’s no longer any ABI-breaking impact. Without this patch, LoongArch’s software emulation for fp16 operations still has [correctness issues](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/97975). This is why downstream software depends on it, which is the reason for my request. Thanks. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109093 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits