================
@@ -9304,7 +9299,8 @@ TemplateName
ASTContext::getAssumedTemplateName(DeclarationName Name) const {
TemplateName ASTContext::getQualifiedTemplateName(NestedNameSpecifier *NNS,
bool TemplateKeyword,
TemplateName Template) const
{
- assert(NNS && "Missing nested-name-specifier in qualified template name");
----------------
ilya-biryukov wrote:
Does that mean we will start creating `QualifiedTemplateName` with a nullptr
qualifier?
That's a big change in contract and there is quite a bit of code that does not
check for null when accessing this member.
Could you explain a bit why we need this change? What are we trying to
represent?
Are there any alternative AST nodes we could use or even add?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93433
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
