Yeah, this `bs` + `stepi` dance is the only workaround I found so far. On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Greg Clayton <clayb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There is a standard for reverse stepping where the GDB remote protocol was > extended to do the reverse stepping. See: > > https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Packets.html > > Look for "reverse" in the text. They added "bc" for reverse continue and > "bs" for reverse step. We should be using these if possible. > > > On Aug 23, 2017, at 10:00 AM, Ted Woodward <ted.woodw...@codeaurora.org> > wrote: > > Perhaps a manual packet that tells your remote server that the next “s” > packet is a reverse step, then run the lldb command “si”. > > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
