I'm trying to reverse-step. So I think I'd need to refresh all thread states?
> On Aug 18, 2017, at 4:50 PM, Jim Ingham <jing...@apple.com> wrote: > > No, there hasn't been a need for this. > > What commands are you planning to send? Or equivalently, how much state are > you expecting to change? > > Jim > >> On Aug 18, 2017, at 4:36 PM, Vadim Chugunov via lldb-dev >> <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Is there any way to force lldb to refresh it's internal record of debuggee >> process state (as if it had just received a stop event)? I want to send a >> custom command to remote gdb process stub (via `process plugin packet >> send`). This works, but if the command alters debuggee state, lldb won't >> know about it. >> _______________________________________________ >> lldb-dev mailing list >> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
