Yea it's only clang bots i think On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 6:30 AM Pavel Labath via lldb-dev < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Wow, I had no idea things were that bad. LLDB buildbots do not seem to > be affected though, so I think we should proceed. > > pl > > > > On 6 September 2016 at 14:09, Ed Maste <ema...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 6 September 2016 at 08:51, Pavel Labath <lab...@google.com> wrote: > >> Hi Ed, > >> > >> which bots are you referring to? Our bots were red overnight, but > >> we've been cleaning them up now, and they should get green shortly. As > >> far as we're concerned, the reformat can go on as planned. > > > > The "Buildbot General Failure - Production Stop?" thread on llvm-dev > > is what concerned me -- > > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-September/104564.html > > > > Quoting from there, > >> Essentially, the bots were all lying when they said this or that > >> commit "passed", since they were still testing the same old commit. > >> All our bots were affected, and it seems many other Windows, PowerPC, > >> s390, Atom, etc. > > > > I'm not certain which bots are affected but the thread makes it sound > > like there's a significant problem in the zorg infrastructure > > affecting many bots. Perhaps all lldb bots of interest are not > > affected though? > > > > From my perspective on FreeBSD I'm fine with the reformat proceeding, > > as my plan was always to manually validate the test run. > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
