Hi Ed, which bots are you referring to? Our bots were red overnight, but we've been cleaning them up now, and they should get green shortly. As far as we're concerned, the reformat can go on as planned.
pl On 6 September 2016 at 13:06, Ed Maste via lldb-dev <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3 September 2016 at 00:30, Kate Stone via lldb-dev > <[email protected]> wrote: >> As a reminder, any pending commits you might have planned for LLDB this >> weekend must not break any of the bots we’re using to validate the health of >> the source tree. > > Given the current non-functional state of the bots, what is the plan > for proceeding with the formatting change? For FreeBSD the bot was > building lldb but not running the tests and I was planning to manually > validate the tests. > > For reference at r280675 on my FreeBSD desktop there are a few tests > that report errors (the libstdcpp ones, as FreeBSD 10 and later use > libc++), two that abort with an assertion ("Breakpoint update > failed!"), and three that sometimes time out (test_asm_int_3, > test_iter_registers_dwarf, test_with_dsym_and_python_api_dwarf). > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
