You can grep for " {$". With this regex I see no false positives and 272 case with 40 or more leading spaces
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016, 17:59 Zachary Turner via lldb-dev, < lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Here it is > > > grep -n '^ \+' . -r -o | awk '{t=length($0);sub(" *$","");printf("%s%d\n", > $0, t-length($0));}' | sort -t: -n -k 3 -r | awk 'BEGIN { FS = ":" } ; { if > ($3 >= 50) print $0 }' > On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 9:54 AM Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > >> I tried that, but most of the results (and there are a ton to wade >> through) are function parameters that wrapped and align with the opening >> paren on the next line. >> >> Earlier in the thread (i think it was this thread anyway) i posted a bash >> incantation that will grep the source tree and return all lines with >= N >> leading spaces sorted descending by number of leading spaces. The highest >> was about 160 :) >> >> If you search lldb-dev for awk or sed you'll probably find it >> On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 9:10 AM Chris Lattner <clatt...@apple.com> wrote: >> >>> Can you just grep for “^ “ or something? >>> That seems like a straight-forward way to find lines that have a ton of >>> leading indentation. >>> >>> -Chris >>> >>> On Aug 27, 2016, at 9:28 AM, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote: >>> >>> It will probably be hard to find all the cases. Unfortunately >>> clang-tidy doesn't have a "detect deep indentation" check, but that would >>> be pretty useful, so maybe I'll try to add that at some point (although I >>> doubt I can get to it before the big reformat). >>> >>> Finding all of the egregious cases before the big reformat will present >>> a challenge, so I'm not sure if it's better to spend effort trying, or just >>> deal with it as we spot code that looks bad because of indentation level. >>> >>> On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 9:24 AM Chris Lattner <clatt...@apple.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Aug 26, 2016, at 6:12 PM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev < >>>> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Back to the formatting issue, there's a lot of code that's going to >>>> look bad after the reformat, because we have some DEEPLY indented code. >>>> LLVM has adopted the early return model for this reason. A huge amount of >>>> our deeply nested code could be solved by using early returns. >>>> >>>> >>>> FWIW, early returns are part of the LLVM Coding standard: >>>> >>>> http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#use-early-exits-and-continue-to-simplify-code >>>> >>>> So it makes sense for LLDB to adopt this approach at some point. >>>> >>>> I don’t have an opinion about whether it happens before or after the >>>> "big reformat", but I guess I agree with your point that doing it would be >>>> good to do it for the most egregious cases before the reformat. >>>> >>>> -Chris >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev