I tried that, but most of the results (and there are a ton to wade through) are function parameters that wrapped and align with the opening paren on the next line.
Earlier in the thread (i think it was this thread anyway) i posted a bash incantation that will grep the source tree and return all lines with >= N leading spaces sorted descending by number of leading spaces. The highest was about 160 :) If you search lldb-dev for awk or sed you'll probably find it On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 9:10 AM Chris Lattner <clatt...@apple.com> wrote: > Can you just grep for “^ “ or something? > That seems like a straight-forward way to find lines that have a ton of > leading indentation. > > -Chris > > On Aug 27, 2016, at 9:28 AM, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > > It will probably be hard to find all the cases. Unfortunately clang-tidy > doesn't have a "detect deep indentation" check, but that would be pretty > useful, so maybe I'll try to add that at some point (although I doubt I can > get to it before the big reformat). > > Finding all of the egregious cases before the big reformat will present a > challenge, so I'm not sure if it's better to spend effort trying, or just > deal with it as we spot code that looks bad because of indentation level. > > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 9:24 AM Chris Lattner <clatt...@apple.com> wrote: > >> On Aug 26, 2016, at 6:12 PM, Zachary Turner via lldb-dev < >> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Back to the formatting issue, there's a lot of code that's going to look >> bad after the reformat, because we have some DEEPLY indented code. LLVM >> has adopted the early return model for this reason. A huge amount of our >> deeply nested code could be solved by using early returns. >> >> >> FWIW, early returns are part of the LLVM Coding standard: >> >> http://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#use-early-exits-and-continue-to-simplify-code >> >> So it makes sense for LLDB to adopt this approach at some point. >> >> I don’t have an opinion about whether it happens before or after the "big >> reformat", but I guess I agree with your point that doing it would be good >> to do it for the most egregious cases before the reformat. >> >> -Chris >> > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev